| Zakładka z wyszukiwarką danych komponentów |
|
LTC1702IGN Arkusz danych(PDF) 20 Page - Linear Technology |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LTC1702IGN Arkusz danych(HTML) 20 Page - Linear Technology |
|
20 / 36 page ![]() 20 LTC1702 tantalum capacitors specifically designed for use with switching regulators. When choosing a tantalum input capacitor, make sure that it is rated to carry the RMS current that the LTC1702 will draw. If the data sheet doesn’t give an RMS current rating, chances are the capacitor isn’t surge tested. Don’t use it! OUTPUT BYPASS CAPACITOR The output bypass capacitor has quite different require- ments from the input capacitor. The ripple current at the output of a buck regulator like the LTC1702 is much lower than at the input, due to the fact that the inductor current is constantly flowing at the output whenever the LTC1702 is operating in continuous mode. The primary concern at the output is capacitor ESR. Fast load current transitions at the output will appear as voltage across the ESR of the output bypass capacitor until the feedback loop in the LTC1702 can change the inductor current to match the new load current value. This ESR step at the output is often the single largest budget item in the load regulation calculation. As an example, our hypothetical 1.6V, 10A switcher with a 0.01 Ω ESR output capacitor would expe- rience a 100mV step at the output with a 0 to 10A load step—a 6.3% output change! Usually the solution is to parallel several capacitors at the output. For example, to keep the transient response inside of 3% with the previous design, we’d need an output ESR better than 0.0048 Ω. This can be met with three 0.014Ω, 470 µF low ESR tantalum capacitors in parallel. INDUCTOR The inductor in a typical LTC1702 circuit is chosen prima- rily for value and saturation current. The inductor value sets the ripple current, which is commonly chosen at around 40% of the anticipated full load current. Ripple current is set by: I tV L RIPPLE ON Q OUT = () () 2 In our hypothetical 1.6V, 10A example, we'd set the ripple current to 40% of 10A or 4A, and the inductor value would be: APPLICATIONS INFORMATION L tV I sV A H with t V V kHz s ON Q OUT RIPPLE ON Q = () = µ ()( ) =µ =− =µ () () .. . . /. 2 2 12 16 4 05 1 16 5 550 1 2 The inductor must not saturate at the expected peak current. In this case, if the current limit was set to 15A, the inductor should be rated to withstand 15A + 1/2 IRIPPLE, or 17A without saturating. FEEDBACK LOOP/COMPENSATION1 Feedback Loop Types In a typical LTC1702 circuit, the feedback loop consists of the modulator, the external inductor and output capacitor, and the feedback amplifier and its compensation network. All of these components affect loop behavior and need to be accounted for in the loop compensation. The modulator consists of the internal PWM generator, the output MOSFET drivers and the external MOSFETs themselves. From a feedback loop point of view, it looks like a linear voltage transfer function from COMP to SW and has a gain roughly equal to the input voltage. It has fairly benign AC behavior at typical loop compensation frequencies with significant phase shift appearing at half the switching frequency. The external inductor/output capacitor combination makes a more significant contribution to loop behavior. These components cause a second order LC roll-off at the output, with the attendant 180 ° phase shift. This roll-off is what filters the PWM waveform, resulting in the desired DC output voltage, but the phase shift complicates the loop compensation if the gain is still higher than unity at the pole frequency. Eventually (usually well above the LC pole frequency), the reactance of the output capacitor will approach its ESR, and the roll-off due to the capacitor will stop, leaving 6dB/octave and 90 ° of phase shift (Figure 8). So far, the AC response of the loop is pretty well out of the user’s control. The modulator is a fundamental piece of the LTC1702 design, and the external L and C are usually chosen based on the regulation and load current require- ments without considering the AC loop response. The 1The information in this section is based on the paper “The K Factor: A New Mathematical Tool for Stability Analysis and Synthesis” by H. Dean Venable, Venable Industries, Inc. For complete paper, see “Reference Reading #4” at www.linear-tech.com. |
|
Link URL |
| Czy Alldatasheet okazała się pomocna? [ DONATE ] |
O Alldatasheet | Reklama | Kontakt | Polityka prywatności | Link do karty katalogowej | Linki | Lista producentów All Rights Reserved©Alldatasheet.com |
| Russian : Alldatasheetru.com | Korean : Alldatasheet.co.kr | Spanish : Alldatasheet.es | French : Alldatasheet.fr | Italian : Alldatasheetit.com Portuguese : Alldatasheetpt.com | Polish : Alldatasheet.pl | Vietnamese : Alldatasheet.vn Indian : Alldatasheet.in | Mexican : Alldatasheet.com.mx | British : Alldatasheet.co.uk | New Zealand : Alldatasheet.co.nz |
|
Family Site : ic2ic.com |
icmetro.com |